Author: Eiko

Tags: quiver variety, algebraic geometry, representation theory, Dynkin, extended Dynkin

Time: 2024-12-08 23:28:08 - 2024-12-09 18:28:44 (UTC)

For the basic notions and results appearing in this example sheet, you should recall here.

A basic summary is put here for quick reminder.

  • There is an associated root system to a quiver.

  • For finite type quivers (i.e. for any \(\alpha\), only have finite many indecomposable reps. Finite type \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dynkin)

    • Indecomposable Representations \(\Leftrightarrow\) Positive roots

    • Using reflection functors one can obtain all indecomposable from simples, which is the same as obtaining all positive roots from simple roots \(e_i\).

  • Associated to a quiver \(Q\) we have a doubled quiver \(\overline{Q}\) and associated to doubled quiver we have a moment map \(\mu_{\overline{Q},\alpha}: \mathrm{Rep}(Q,\alpha)\to \mathrm{Lie}(G_\alpha)^*\).

  • Quiver varieties

    \[\mathfrak{M}_\theta(Q,\alpha) = \mu^{-1}_{\overline{Q},\alpha}(0)/\!\!/_\theta G_\alpha, \quad \mathfrak{M}(Q,\alpha) = \mu^{-1}_{\overline{Q},\alpha}(0)/\!\!/G_\alpha.\]

  • Parameter function

    \[p_Q(\alpha) = 1 - \langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle_Q = 1 + \sum_{s\to t\in Q} \alpha_s\alpha_t - \sum_i \alpha_i^2.\]

    When \(\alpha\) is a root, \(2p_Q(\alpha)\) is the dimension of \(\mathfrak{M}_\theta(Q,\alpha)\).

Examples Of Computations Of \(p(\alpha)\)

The parameter \(p(\alpha)\) conveys the meaning of number of parameters of representations of dimension \(\alpha\) and is of fundamental importance. Let’s see some examples,

  • we will use \(A_i\) to denote the Dynkin quiver with \(i\) vertices,

  • use \(\hat{A_i}\) to denote the extended Dynkin quiver with \(i+1\) vertices,

  • and \(F(\hat{A_i})\) to denote the framed extended Dynkin quiver with \(i+2\) vertices.

\(\hat{A_0}\)

The \(A_0\) quiver might sounds a bit too funny because it is empty. But we think of the extended \(A_0\) quiver \(\hat{A_0}\) to be the Jordan quiver which is a single vertex with exactly one loop. Whose representations are just assigning a vector space at that node.

rendering math failed o.o

Here \(n\) is the dimension of that representation space.

If we compute the inner product we have

\[\langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle = \alpha_0\alpha_0 - \alpha_0^2 = n^2 - n^2 = 0\]

\[p(\alpha) = 1 - \langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle = 1.\]

So \(\alpha\) corresponds to an isotropic imaginary root, and it has a single parameter.

\(F(\hat{A_0})\)

rendering math failed o.o

\[\langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle = 1 + a^2 - a - a^2 = 1 - a.\] \[p_Q(\alpha) = 1 - (1-a) = a.\]

For \(\theta=(a,-1)\), this \(\mathfrak{M}_\theta(Q,\alpha)\) is our classical Hilbert scheme \((\mathbb{C}^2)^{[a]}\).

For \(\theta=0\), it reduces to \(\mathfrak{M}(Q,\alpha)\) which is the symmetric product \(\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathbb{C}^2)\). You can see that the stratifications of \(\mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathbb{C}^2)\) corresponds to the partitions of \(a\), which perfectly matches the decomposition of the dimension vector \(\alpha\).

\[\alpha = (1,0) + a_1(0,1) + \dots + a_k(0,1)\] \[\begin{align*} \mathrm{Sym}^a(\mathbb{C}^2) &= \bigsqcup_{a_1+\dots+a_k=a} S^n_{a_1,\dots,a_k}\mathbb{C}^2\\ &= \bigsqcup_{a_1+\dots+a_k=a} \left\{ \sum_{i\le k} a_i[x_i] : x_i \text{ distinct} \right\} \end{align*}\]

\(F(\hat{A_1})\)

rendering math failed o.o

\[\langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle = 1 + a^2 + b^2 - a - 2 ab = 1 + (a-b)^2 - a\]

\[p_Q(\alpha) = a - (a-b)^2.\]

\(F(\hat{A_2})\)

rendering math failed o.o

\[\langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle = 1 + a^2 + b^2 + c^2 - a - ab - bc - ac = 1 + \frac{(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-a)^2}{2} - a.\]

\[p_Q(\alpha) = a - \frac{(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-a)^2}{2}.\]

\(F(\hat{A_3})\)

rendering math failed o.o

\[\begin{align*} \langle \alpha, \alpha\rangle &= 1 + a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + d^2 - a - ab - bc - cd - da \\ &= 1 + \frac{(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-d)^2 + (d-a)^2}{2} - a. \end{align*}\]

\[p_Q(\alpha) = a - \frac{(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-d)^2 + (d-a)^2}{2}.\]

Examples Of The Semistable Set \(\Sigma_{\lambda,\theta}\)

Computing \(\Sigma_{\lambda,\theta}(F(\hat{A_1}))\)

The situation we are considering is \(\lambda = 0\), and \(\theta = (n,-1)\). The case \(\theta=0\) might also be interesting, we might consider it later.

  • rendering math failed o.o

    \[ p = n \]

  • rendering math failed o.o

    \[ p = n - 1 \]

  • rendering math failed o.o

    \[ p = n - 4 \]

  • rendering math failed o.o

    \[ p = n - m^2 \]

Since all possible decompositions that can happen in \(R_\theta^+\) look like

\[(1,n,a+b) = (1,n,a) + (0,0,b)\]

We conclude that

\[\Sigma_{\lambda,\theta}(F\hat{A_1}) = \{(1,n,n-m) : m^2\le n\} \cup \{(0,0,k):k\ge 0\}.\]

And the canonical decomposition of \(\alpha\) is just \(\alpha\).

Stratums corresponds to the decomposition of vectors

\[(1,n,n) = (1,n,n-m) + m(0,0,1), \quad 0\le m \le \lfloor \sqrt{n} \rfloor.\] \[ p(1,n,n-m) = n - m^2, \quad p(0,0,1) = 0.\]

therefore there will be \(\lfloor \sqrt{n} \rfloor+1\) strata.