Author: Eiko
Tags: algebraic geometry, moduli space, moduli functor, grassmannian
Time: 2024-10-21 22:21:00 - 2024-10-26 07:32:00 (UTC)
Moduli functors are contravariant functors from certain category of base spaces to the category of sets, we imagine them as the functors mapping a base space to the set of families over . This concept is of fundamental importance in the moduli theory.
Moduli Functors
For a category and an object , there is a functor of points that somehow implements the idea of “points of ”.
For a base space , the set is the set of morphisms in . For example for a field , then is the set of -points of .
The category is usually called the category of presheaves on .
Yoneda Lemma
For any contravariant functor , there is a natural isomorphism
where is the component of at .
The functor is fully faithful.
In fact, simply applying Yoneda Lemma to
Representable Functors
A presheaf is called representable if there is an isomorphism for some . The object is called a representing object of .
Usually in moduli problem, for some equivalence relation with functor maps being pullbacks of families, and we want to know if is representable by , if so, is the fine moduli space of the problem because -families are just -points of .
Fine Moduli Space
When a data for fine moduli space is given, we can define a universal family as family in that maps to under .
Now any family over
corresponds to a map . The functor map maps the universal family to , as shown in the naturality diagram

As a result, the family is the functor image, and thus the pullback of the universal family along the map .

Coarse Moduli Space
The condition of being fine moduli space is pretty strong and our schemes are not strong enough to handle the singularities and non-separatedness that may arise. So if you want to stay in the usual algebraic geometry world, we often consider a weaker notion of moduli space called coarse moduli space.
A coarse moduli space is a natural transformation (not requiring isomorphism) , if
It encodes the objects on geometric points correctly, i.e. for any algebraic closed field , is a bijection.
It is universal, or somehow of minimal degree of freedom, i.e. for any other natural transformation factor through .
Examples
The global section functor mapping to is representable by the affine line (over ) .
To see this, note that
This can be seen as the family of points in the trivial fibre bundle, and it exactly coincides with the concept of family of points in , the moduli space of points. The universal family is the projection .
The scheme represents the following moduli problem, the families over are line bundles on and sections , such that these sections do not vanish together, or equivalently, is surjective. Two families over are equivalent if there is an isomorphism of line bundles that sends one family to the other.
The universal family is the line bundle with its sections .
Representabilify
A presheaf is a sheaf (Zariski) if for any Zariski cover of , the sequence
is exact (equalizer of the two maps). Here we are actually using the Zariski site.
Fact 1. A representable presheaf must be a sheaf in Zariski topology, since is sheaf by gluing morphisms.
Categorical Interlude
Open Subfunctors
A subfunctor is called open if for any scheme , and any morphism , the pullback (which functions as intersection here) is representable by an open subscheme of .
Similarly we can define closed subfunctors.
A collection of open subfunctors is called an open cover of if for any scheme and map , the pullbacks form an open cover of .
For simplicity we will simply write instead of when we speak of schemes as functors.
Theorem. If a presheaf is a Zariski sheaf and has an representable open cover , then is representable.
Grassmannians
Consider the functor given by
where is a surjective map, is a rank locally free sheaf (vector bundle) on . The equivalence relation is given by compatible automorphisms .
This is the Grassmannian functor . By taking kernel we have that it actually maps to the set of rank subbundles of . If you like the classical convention, you can take the dual and the image of is a rank subbundle.
Theorem. The Grassmannian functor is representable by a finite type scheme over .
For each -subset , we can define an open subfunctor corresponding to the affine stratum where the the -subspace