Author: Eiko
Time: 2025-04-12 04:11:30 - 2025-05-11 06:45:18 (UTC)
Jet Schemes
Let be a scheme of finite type over , the jet scheme is characterized by the following identification of functor of points
One can view this as an adjoint pair of functors, and the ordinary points of the jet scheme corresponds to thickened points of the original scheme
For example one can imagine as the set of tangent vectors, elements in the tangent bundle . When , the jet scheme reduces to the original scheme .
There is a canonical projection map when ,
induced by the inclusion map (which sets higher order terms zero). This is a direct system, so forms a projective system and we can take the limit
which is thought as arc space of , whose functor of points is obviously the limit
where is the formal power series ring over .
The is a covariant endofunctor in the category of schemes of finite type over , if we would have , defined as ‘pushforward’
The functor maps are compatible with the projection maps.
Examples
Jet Schemes of Affine Spaces
Let , we have
The map specifies a formula as a function of for each of the coordinate
and this defines a local order curve, this local curve is a point in the jet scheme .
(Random thought: hey this looks like a point in a Hilbert scheme, for example at a smooth point of our variety, when two points collide, it remembers a tangent direction (but without direction, it’s a projective direction) we seem to have a point in the first jet space. Maybe if we define a action on the jet space, and take quotient, we will arrive at some projective jet scheme that is similar to Hilbert scheme?)
Easy Properties
If exists and is open, then exists as well given by .
If is an embedding, then is also an embedding.
Jet functor commutes with finite products,
For a group scheme over , the jet scheme is also a group scheme over . (imagine it as multiplication of two local curves)
For a morphism and closed embedding,
For any etale morphism , the diagram

is cartesian. Intuitively this means you can lift a local curve uniquely over an etale morphism. (Does this look like the Homotopy lifting property in homotopy theory?)